﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>1BC Civ Forums / Civilization IV Discussion / 1BC CivIV BTS Multi Team Battle / Senate Floor / Dgame Archive </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>1BC Civ Forums</description><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/</link><webMaster>forums@1bcciv.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:14:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>565BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2241598-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings all..&lt;P&gt;As President, I bring before the Senate a summary of the next 5 turns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First things first, the trade approved by the Senate will be completed...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workers:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More of the same... Chopping Jungle around Tolosa and Improving the area around the Capital and Vienne&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scouts and Naval:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Continued Explorations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cities:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bibracte: Library complete in 3 turns. I would like to follow it with a Granary(9). This will help with health and growth and will set the stage for a wonder build next.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vienne: Worker complete in 7 turns. This would not be covered by this set of turns, but I will suggest our UU, the Gallic Warrior to be the next build for discussion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tolosa: Monument complete in 1 turn. I would like to follow this with a Spearman (11 turns.. will be reduced by current worker action). The Spearman would be followed by a Settler.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators (or their appointed deputies in case of absence), please vote yea, nay or abstain to the proposal set forth above.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:45:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>565BC Trade Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2241249-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators, from my BtS induced haze, I propose the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To Egypt, we trade Iron Working (429 cost) in return for Meditation and Archery (298 cost total)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a somewhat lopsided trade in Egypts favor, but I would like to point out reasoning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Egypt is on the same continent with a strong Inca Empire. The Inca do not yet have Iron Working and are not on good terms with Egypt (Annoyed). Egypt is similarly annoyed with the Inca. They are followers of a different religion and are not likely trading partners. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If they come to conflict, which is likely based on other games I've had with the inca, Egypt would have the advantage of having Iron Working first to have a "leg up" so to speak.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will also further solidify our relationship with Egypt. We should also think about Open Borders to help our religion spread to the rest of Egypts cities. (A Senator can put that vote together if you wish)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please vote yea, nay, or abstain to the trade listed about (Senators or their designated deputies only)</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:31:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Clerkship</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240649-93-1.aspx</link><description>Esteemed senators, I do not believe it is necessary to change the constitution in order to create a clerkship for Tosk (if his interest has not waned and fizzled and died out yet).  We should be able to cover this in a law.  I do not wish to put words or deeds in your mouths, but it would also be impolite to tell you to get on with it and leave it at that, so I offer here for close perusal a draft of a possible law:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[b]The Supreme Court may appoint for itself a clerk to assist in those of its duties that qualify as strictly clerical in nature.  The clerk shall serve for life, or until he resigns, or until he is dismissed by the Supreme Court, whichever may come first. [/b]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whaddayamean is that everything?! :P</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:35:59 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Zigeuner</dc:creator></item><item><title>580BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240664-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators, apologies for delays... Work and a BtS install have delayed things a bit (Not playing BtS, but the subsequent halting of my Warlords pbem because of the BtS automatic upgrade is making things difficult.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I bring before the Senate a plan for the next turn.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is currently a &lt;A href="http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240663-93-1.aspx"&gt;Trade Request&lt;/A&gt; before the Senate. Once it has reached a majority (in favor, I hope), this CPR can be voted on..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since there is only 1 turn's worth of authority requested, this one is fairly simple.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the trade is approved, it would be enacted at once and the workers waiting to farm the rice will commence. Play will be halted on the next turn to determine further trade possibilities opened up by the acquired tech.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators, please vote yea, nay, or abstain to this proposal [b]after the Trade Request linked above is approved.[/b]</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:14:41 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Tech Trading proposal.</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240500-93-1.aspx</link><description>I dont mean to usurpe anyone athority but i want i get this whole tech trading proposal wrapped up. I have highlighted what i believe to be the best options, in this respect i would like for some one with warlords to see if these are even an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[quote]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore reviewing my statement against everyone elses here is a possible outline for our Trading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Monotheism To Egypt for Meditation or Priesthood&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Monotheism to Arabia For Agriculture or Archery&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mysticism to Germany For Agriculture or Archery&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Polytheism to France for Agriculture or Archery.[/quote]</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:34:45 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>swordinthestorm</dc:creator></item><item><title>580BC Trade Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240663-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to propose a single trade so that we may complete 1 turn to see what the newly acquired techs open up for us in the way of more trade possibilities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I propose that we trade Monotheism (256) to Egypt for Agriculture and Priesthood (Combined 254).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will allow workers to begin farming the rice and will allow us to check next turn to see what we have available to us in trade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the next turn, we can resume the practice of moving along in 5 to 10 turn increments (probably 5 since we have quite a bit going on now).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators, please vote yea, nay, or abstain to this proposal...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I'm going to get the Continued play request in order now as well... As soon as this proposal has a majority vote, the Senators can vote in the Continued Play request and we can get this show on the road....</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:09:50 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>My Formal Resignation</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240560-93-1.aspx</link><description>I submit my resignation to the Senate, with many thanks. I can no longer keep up with the work it takes to be a Supreme Court Justice here. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please understand that we all have a lot on our plate.</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:44:59 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mr. G</dc:creator></item><item><title>580BC - Open Borders Vote</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240494-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlViewTopics_ctlPanelBar_ctlForumTopics__ctl22_ctlEditableDescription&gt;&lt;DIV class=SmallGrayText id=lblDescription2239460 style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; DISPLAY: inline; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; OVERFLOW: visible; CURSOR: text; PADDING-TOP: 0px; POSITION: relative" &amp;#111;nclick="return iasp_EditableContent_DivToInput('','lblDescription2239460','http://www.1bcciv.com/AjaxFunctions.aspx','Action=UpdateTopicDescription&amp;amp;SessionID=ixkvsjedrh3aeiusk05twt21&amp;amp;ForumID=93&amp;amp;CurrentID=2239460','SmallGrayText',500);"&gt;&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlViewTopics_ctlPanelBar_ctlForumTopics__ctl22_ctlEditableDescription_lblDescription&gt;&lt;FONT class=SmallGrayText size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;TABLE height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=smalltxt style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px" vAlign=top colSpan=2&gt;&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;Fellow Senators, &lt;P&gt;We had had some discussion about opening borders with Germany. We think it is a good idea, and propose the President should make such a treaty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per discussion here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url]http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240390-93-1.aspx[/url]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We feel it will help us to increase our friendship with Fred and the Germans. Note that the Germans may be a good potential ally in future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please show your approval/disapproval of this summary by voting yea, nay, or abstain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:59:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Article of Law 20070727 Official Vote Thread</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240503-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;This thread is for the senate to vote on the proposed draft of an Article of Law: &lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By Majority, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;Election Dropouts&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;If a candidate drops out of an election, they cannot re-enter election.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;The tier of government* holding the election, must do the following:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;(a) In cases where leading candidate has stepped down mid race, the runner up will be awarded the position, as long as said candidate has recieved a tally of no less than a value of three fifths (3/5 or 60%) of the Leaders tally. Thus proportionally represented.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;(b) In cases where the candidate stepping down is not the leader, the leading candidate at the end of the election period should win the election as expected.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;(c) If conditions (a) or (b) are not met, the election is void and must be re-held without said candidate.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;*For SC Elections, this would be the Princep/Senate. For Senate/President elections, this would be the Supreme Court&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;After some chaotic results in a recent Senate election, it was felt that there should be some conditions laid down pertaining to election dropouts. See the thread here:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url]http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240313-93-2.aspx[/url]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All votes are to be cast in person with a call of Aye in favor, Nay if not in favor, or Abstain if indifferent to the proposed draft.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:16:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Article of Law 20070726 Official Vote Thread</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240459-93-1.aspx</link><description>This thread is for the senate to vote on the proposed draft of an Article of Law:&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By Majority, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;Resignation Law&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;If an elected official resigns, then his deputy (if available) will manage the position on an interim basis, until a replacement can be elected by the people. The deputy may run in said election.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;If no deputy is available, then an election must be held as soon as possible to fill the position.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;This law is required to remove confusion around what happens when an official resigns. The reason for the deputy holding the role on an interim basis is allow the game to continue in the short term where possible whilst elections are run to find a replacement.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All votes are to be cast in person with a call of Aye in favor, Nay if not in favor, or Abstain if indifferent to the proposed draft.&lt;BR&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:01:54 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Tie-Breaking Votes Draft</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240448-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;FONT color=#111177&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;I, Bismarck2990, propose the following additions be made to the Consitution:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111177&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Princep's Tie-Breaking Vote:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR&gt;[QUOTE]&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;4. The Senate shall elect from their number, by simple majority, a Princeps, who shall:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;- Hold votes among the Senators on such issues as presented before them, which require a decision by majority.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;- Confirm the outcome of votes among the Senators and present the outcome to the People and to those parties whom it may concern.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#dd3333&gt;- Receive one additional vote in the event the Senate is unable to reach a simple majority due to a tie.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;- Take upon himself all duties of the Presidency, should the President and Vice President become absent, with the special responsibility of requesting that the Supreme Court hold new Presidential elections as soon as possible.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;- Organize and oversee the elections of the Supreme Court, and execute the outcome thereof.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;- Organize and oversee such plebiscites as necessary to approve alterations to the Articles of Constitution. [/QUOTE]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;President's Tie-Breaking Vote&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;P&gt;[QUOTE]&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;5a. The President may veto the Senate once per term, on any one of the actions described in II_5, unless the Senate vote was unanimous.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;5b. A Presidential veto must be made public before the President executes the action, allowing the Senate ample time to disband the office of the Presidency (per III_5).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;6. The President must appoint for himself a Vice President, who shall take upon himself all duties of the Presidency, should the President become absent.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;6a. The Vice President shall be considered a member of the Presidency, should the Presidency be disbanded.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#dd3333&gt;7a.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT color=#dd3333&gt; In the event the Senate is unable to elect its Princep without simple majority due to a tie, the President will be included in the ballot and allowed one vote.  &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#dd3333&gt;7b. This vote will only be used to determine the result of any tie and the President will be unable to abstain.  &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#dd3333&gt;7c. The President must only vote for one of the candidates involved in the tie.[/QUOTE]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:56:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bismarck2990</dc:creator></item><item><title>My Speech to the Senate</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240397-93-1.aspx</link><description>Outline:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Expand, expand, expand...the Supreme Court and possibly the Senate must be expanded&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) The Senate needs to move faster on enacting critical legislation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Simplify, simplify, simplify...the Senate needs to stop being so burercratic (?sp) and start streamlining its proceedings slightly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:54:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mr. G</dc:creator></item><item><title>Open borders with Germany</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240390-93-1.aspx</link><description> In the last set of turns, Frederick came before our president and requested Open Borders.  All discussion for said option is to be brought forth, if you please.  This is not a voting thread, that's CD's job. :P&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I, personally, see no reason not to.  It's not like he can send scouts snooping in our land.  However, I would like to ask someone who can open saves who Freddie is and isn't friendly with.  We may get a few "you traded with our worst enemies" modifiers, and we should take such into account.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:47:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>psweetman1590</dc:creator></item><item><title>3rd Article of Law</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240313-93-1.aspx</link><description>As suggested in the impeachment thread, I think it's prudent to create a law dealing with all unofficial threads (not just princeps nominations).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I take it most are in favor of allowing said threads to exist freely.  Thus, I would propose, as a first draft, the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Threads and discussions not intended to carry official weight, force a ruling, or otherwise directly influence the running of the government are considered to be outside the jurisdiction of Constitutional review by the Supreme Court and are not to be closed or restricted by reason of interfering with the Supreme Court's or any other government body's Constitutional duties."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let the discussion commence!</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:04:06 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>psweetman1590</dc:creator></item><item><title>Articles of Law</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240457-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Articles of Law&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Do not post in this thread!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following articles of law have been voted upon and approved by the Senate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url=http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2237589-93-1.aspx]Article of Law #1, concerning election protocols[/url]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url=http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2237631-93-1.aspx]Article of Law #2, concerning absence[/url]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url=http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240459-93-1.aspx]Article of Law 20070726, concerning resignations[/url]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[url=http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240503-93-1.aspx]Article of Law 20070727, concerning election dropouts[/url]&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt; </description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:49:39 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>3rd Term Senate Agenda</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240283-93-1.aspx</link><description>Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The time is right to start determining what needs to be discussed and voted upon during this term. Here are my initial suggestions, let me know if you have any more:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Supreme Court&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Whatever needs to occur from the fallout from the "impeachment" thread&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Creating a Deputy/Clerk for the Supreme Court, and what this would entail&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vice Presidency&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Giving the Vice President something to do&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Potentially requiring the Senate to endorse the President's choice for VP?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Housekeeping&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Forum required as a repository for official article of law threads, so they don't get lost.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:28:05 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Dismissal of Toraradical - Senate Vote Thread</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240316-93-1.aspx</link><description>It is with a heavy heart that I open this thread, but I see no other option. :(&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By quorum vote, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current Supreme Justice, Toraradical, will be dismissed with immediate effect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this passes the Senate must then hold elections for a replacement justice, as per the constitution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on on the Impeachment Thread: [url]http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240035-93-1.aspx[/url]. A number of citizens have taken issue with Tor's approach to the position. He has not been accountable or justified himself sufficiently. Hence his position is now untenable and would be better served by replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;All votes are to be cast in person with a call of Yea if in favor, Nay if not in favor, or Abstain if indifferent to the proposed decision.&lt;BR&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:47:54 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Impeachment of TORARADICAL</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240035-93-1.aspx</link><description>This is idiotic to be completely honest...&lt;P&gt;I started the third term nomination thread,  as did Scipio at the beginning of the second term,  and I was insulted and met with demands that I must apologize to the court lest the thread be closed for being unconstitutional.  The thread was met with the approval of all but one person --- and after I refused to apologize to the court,  I was met with the thread being closed.  &lt;P&gt;The thread is constitutionally valid,  it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.  However,  the very fact I was demanded to apologize,  is what is troubling.  It's nothing but overzealous and unneeded behavior from this Judge and I hereby call for his impeachement.&lt;P&gt;Before any vote can take place,  we must wait for the House of Scorpius to be filled.  In the mean time,  this area should be used as discussion.  I apologize for this negative but rightfully placed call.&lt;P&gt;Refference:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://206.196.26.167/Topic2239983-93-1.aspx"&gt;Nomination Thread: 3rd Term&lt;/A&gt;&lt;P&gt;The judge has also messaged me with the following:&lt;P&gt;&lt;TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=smalltxt vAlign=top&gt;&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlPrivateMessage_ctlPanelBar_ctlPrivateMessageRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;[QUOTE]Senator Bismarck, you are hereby accused and convicted by The Supreme Court of violation of The Constitution of this land.[/QUOTE]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:57:19 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bismarck2990</dc:creator></item><item><title>640BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240307-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I bring before you a summary of the next 4 turns...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's only 4 turns because on the 4th turn, we will have researched Alphabet and will be able to trade techs. I think it will be important to stop there and discuss trade possibilities. We won't have an idea what to research next until we determine what we can receive in trade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All scouts/naval units will continue as before. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only city build that will finish is Vienne's worker on the 4th turn and I'm inclined to build another worker there when it's complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All Senators please vote yea, nay, or abstain.</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:53 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Princep Nominations</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239983-93-1.aspx</link><description>Probably a meager formality in actually finding our Princep to-be this term,  but in accordance to past tradition,  we might as well start nominations for the position.  Feel free to nominate yourself or any of your fellow senators that you feel worthy of Princep.&lt;P&gt;I nominate ComedyDave for position of Princep.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:31:07 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bismarck2990</dc:creator></item><item><title>640BC Religion Change Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240247-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As discussed in the latest Turn Report, I propose that we change our state religion from Hinduism to Judaism (both of which we have founded) in order to learn more about our rivals (Egypt and Germany specifically). Judaism seems to be the religion which as spread wider at this point in the game, and we lose no production since one of our traits is Spiritual (no anarchy)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators, please vote either yay, nay, or abstain.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:31:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Princeps Election</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240195-93-1.aspx</link><description>Senators, &lt;P&gt;as described by Article III Section IV of the Constitution, please elect a Princeps from your number. Here are your choices:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Comedy Dave&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;psweetman1590&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Bismarck2290&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Abstain&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:56:59 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mr. G</dc:creator></item><item><title>Deputy For House of Olaf</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240206-93-1.aspx</link><description>Jerm has agreed to continue as my deputy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will update the roster appropriately.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:03:19 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Deputy for House of Warmax</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2240174-93-1.aspx</link><description>The senate roster needs to be changed.  HistoryDude, who is no longer my deputy in the present, needs to have his name removed and replaced with swordinthestorm.  My current permissions do not allow me to edit your version of the 'Senate Roster' thread, goose (I assume it's because you're our administrator).  &lt;P&gt;This thread is just a head's up, in case you weren't aware other's were unable to edit the thread. &lt;P&gt;Cheers. :)</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:24:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bismarck2990</dc:creator></item><item><title>2nd Term Senate - Landmark Vote</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239749-93-1.aspx</link><description>Fellow Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I propose we name the mountain in the attached screenshot: "Mount Olaf"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please show your approval/disapproval of this naming by voting yea, nay, or abstain.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:40:03 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>715BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239739-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;Greetings Senators, &lt;P&gt;I bring before you the following summary for the next 5 turns...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not much needs to be done to complete the Senate term, but those things include:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before the ending turn 120, I will enact the Open Borders agreement with the French that was approved by the Senate. This will allow CSS Doomed to take the northern route around the eastern continent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Bibracte, a worker will be complete on the next turn. I propose to build a Library there next to make better use of our commerce towards research. A library would be complete in approx. 13 turns&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Vienne, a monument will be complete in 2 turns, which I would like to follow with a worker to continue the vast labor effort that will be required to help make our continent livable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All scouts will continue scouting as in previous turns attempting to open up new lands. We need to start thinking about ways to free scout Ardal from the Egypt/Inca continent in the near future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This should cover the remaining 5 turns of the Senate term.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the Senators [red](only!)[/red] or their approved deputies in the case of absence, would signify their approval/dissapproval by replying with yea, nay, or abstain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:47:03 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>715BC - Open Borders Vote</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239460-93-1.aspx</link><description>Fellow Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe it makes sense for our nation to agree to an open borders treaty with France. Some of the citzenry have also expressed this belief.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it will assist in our exploration, and we do not appear to have anything to lose at this stage. France is friendly towards us and shares the same religion (Hinduism)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please show your approval/disapproval of this summary by voting yea, nay, or abstain.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:03:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>2nd Term Senate - Landmark Proposal</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239470-93-1.aspx</link><description>Senators,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the chance to name a landmark, before our term is out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following suggestion: The Majestic Mountains&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(In the mountain ranges east of Vienne).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not a vote thread, I want to check if anyone else has any ideas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Please see attached screenshot)</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:34:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Senate Roster</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239671-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;&lt;B&gt;Government Roster&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;* This list is to be updated at the beginning of each new term.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Executive Branch&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;President: mongoose201&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Vice President: (vacant)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;3rd Term Senate&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senate Princep: Comedy Dave&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Olaf&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: Comedy Dave&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: Jerm&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Scorpius&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: psweetman1590&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: Locus Coeruleus&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Warmax&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: Bismarck2290&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: swordinthestorm&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;(Replacing a topic accidently deleted)&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:04 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>865BC City Placement Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239274-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;As President, I bring before the Senate the following: &lt;P&gt;Per Article II Section 5 of the Constitution, I request the authority to place 1BC's third city on the Yellow X location on the pic attached below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;TABLE height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=smalltxt style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px" vAlign=top colSpan=2&gt;&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naming of aforementioned city will be left at default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators (or appointed deputies in the case of Senatorial absence), please post your vote yea, nay, or abstain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=SmlLinks vAlign=bottom&gt;&lt;FONT size=1&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:15:07 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>G's Law</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238963-93-1.aspx</link><description>I, Justice G, do hereby request that the Senate take the following actions after an quorum vote in the affirmative: &lt;P&gt;1. Dissolve and disband the position of Vice Presidency&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Force current Senate Princep &lt;EM&gt;psweetman1590&lt;/EM&gt; to vacate the position and assume a regular Senate position&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Hold elections immediately to determine the new Senate Princep&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Delegate responsibility of determining the Princep's new duties to the Supreme Court&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The proposal is as-is and a vote on all sections of it would be appreciated; however, any suggestions would be lovely. Thank you. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:27:57 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mr. G</dc:creator></item><item><title>865BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239320-93-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=_ctl1_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater__ctl1_lblFullMessage&gt;Greetings Senators, &lt;P&gt;I bring before you the following summary for the next 10 turns...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before ending turn 110, I'll change Bibracte's Citizen allocation in the City Screen back to where Bibracte will grow on the next turn. This will bring us unhealthiness in Bibracte, which will subside when the cattle near Vienne is connected (until we grow again)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our current research is Writing, which will be complete in 2 turns. We will follow Writing with Alphabet so that we will have the option of brokering techs between the civs that have yet to meet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Worker 1 is currently connecting the cattle near Vienne. Worker 2 is building a road that will connect Vienne to our Capital. Once these workers finish these tasks, they will move to connect and farm the rice near the mountains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Bibracte, another chariot will be complete in 5 turns, after which I think at least 2 workers should be trained to connect our third city and chop jungle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Vienne, a spearman will be complete in 6 turns, after which, I would like to build a monument.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, our third city will be founded in the location approved by the Senate. I'm open to suggestions on the first build, but am currently leaning towards a monument there also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All scouts/naval units in the field will continue their scouting activity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should cover most eventualities in the next 10 turns..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All Senators, or their appointed deputies in case of absence, please voice your approval/disapproval of this summary by voting yea, nay, or abstain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:00:24 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Notice of Resignation</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2239047-93-1.aspx</link><description>I hereby resign my position of Princeps of the second Senate for reasons of both outside commitments that reduce the amount of time I can spend on this worthy office's duties, and of outside influence and request that I step down.&lt;P&gt;I resign from the office of Princeps only.  I will keep my Senate seat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also hereby nominate Comedy Dave as my successor.  He has proven to be a great force for change and a very active member.  He shall have my full support.  He shall also have that big chair I bought with my Princeps' salary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;signed&amp;gt; Psweet&lt;BR&gt;Ex-Princeps&lt;P&gt;Here's the chair, CD.  :D&lt;P&gt;[IMG]http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b315/psweetman1590/Princepschair.jpg[/IMG]</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:32:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>psweetman1590</dc:creator></item><item><title>1030BC Continued Play Request</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238739-93-1.aspx</link><description>Greetings Senators,&lt;P&gt;I bring before you the following summary for the next 10 turns...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our current research is The Wheel, which will be complete on the next turn. Pottery is the next logical choice, followed by Writing. We need to get to Alphabet so that we can start brokering techs (to our huge advantage, of course) between our neighboring continents before they get contact...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Bibracte, a Settler will be complete in 7 turns, but I agree with Zig's idea of switching to Chariot next turn (The Wheel) to help quell any barbs that appear, then completing the Settler.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Vienne, a Warrior will be complete in 18 turns, so we don't need to worry about the next build in this set of turns...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Worker 1 is chopping forrest... Worker 2 is working to connect the Iron near Vienne.. Once the Iron is connected, Worker 2 will begin the task of connecting to the cattle NW of Vienne.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scout Ardal is currently stranded on the Egypt/Inca continent... Alaster is exploring the French/Arab/German continent... CSS Doomed (blocked from the east by Germany) is moving back to the west to take the northern path (hopefully) around that continent..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senators, please confirm these plans by posting your vote.. yea, nay, or abstain...</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:47:52 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>mongoose201</dc:creator></item><item><title>Supreme Court Dismissal - Senate Vote Thread</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238513-93-1.aspx</link><description>As discussed, we need to remove the existing SC Justices before we can hold elections for replacements. Hence the Senate needs to vote on the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By quorum vote, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current Supreme Justices, ManiacalMonkey and Von Clausewitz will be dismissed with immediate effect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this passes the Senate must then hold elections for replacement justices, as per the constitution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both Justices cannot devote adequate time to the DGame, we need to replace them to keep the game moving.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[hr]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All votes are to be cast in person with a call of Aye if in favor, Nay if not in favor, or Abstain if indifferent to the proposed draft.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Note that only the 3 senators in the reduced senate may vote on this)</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:19:16 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Senate Reduction - Official Notice</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238512-93-1.aspx</link><description>Senate Announcement:&lt;P&gt;Based on the constitutional amendment &lt;A href="http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238184-86-1.aspx"&gt;http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238184-86-1.aspx&lt;/A&gt;, the senate must be reduced to 3 senators.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given Scip has agreed to step aside if needed, and Scorpius has been absent, I officially declare on behalf of the senate that for the remainder of this senate term, the senate will consist of:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senate Princep: psweetman1590&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Olaf&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: Comedy Dave&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: Jerm&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Scorpius&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: psweetman1590&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: Locus Coeruleus&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;House of Warmax&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator: Bismarck2290&lt;BR&gt;Deputy: HistoryDude&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This declaration is for expediency. If anyone has any objections, please state so now for the record, else let's get this game moving.&lt;P&gt;I have also updated the senate roster to reflect this.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:07:18 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Resignation, Request &amp; Recommendation</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2238188-93-1.aspx</link><description>Senators,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have decided to resign my seat in the Supreme Court as soon as the currently running polls and elections are over. You can read my post in the Town Square for a full explanation on my part. I would recommend that, once I make my resignation final, you also dismiss my absent colleague Von Clausewitz, so the People can elect a new Court in full. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Until such time, if there is any pressing matter you need the SC to attend to, please let me know!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--MM</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:55:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>maniacalmonkey</dc:creator></item><item><title>Senate Authorization Draft (Discussion)</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2237743-93-1.aspx</link><description>This sounds simple enough... opinions? :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[QUOTE]4. The President must deliver a full and comprehensive report before the People and the Senate after every period of ten turns, or when he reaches a point where a decision of the People, the Senate, or the Supreme Court is required to continue play, whichever may come first.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[b]4a.  In addition,  the President must request the Senate's authorization to continue play,  after delivering a full comprehensive report.  In this request,  he will include a summary of his plans regarding foreign affairs,  city production,  and unit orders for those 10 turns.[/b]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. The President must present a request to the Senate, and have it approved by simple majority of the Senate, if he wishes to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Found a new settlement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Disband an existing settlement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Adjust Civics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Engage in treaties with a foreign power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Engage in acts of war with a foreign power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Construct a Wonder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Use up a Great Person.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[b]- Continue play every 10 turns[/b][/QUOTE]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:13:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bismarck2990</dc:creator></item><item><title>Draft: Absence Law</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2237513-93-1.aspx</link><description>Purpose: Given the absences of Senators of late, we need to draft an Absence law. I have tried to keep this from having too much red tape for now, the purpose of this thread is to discuss the topic and come up with a final draft for senate vote.&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PREAMBLE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under Article III Section 5 of the Constitution, the task to "Alter the Articles of Law" falls to the Senate. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further, consideration must be given to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Article III Sections 6 and 7, concerning absence of Senators and their deputies.&lt;BR&gt;Article II section 6, concerning absence of the President and Vice president.&lt;BR&gt;Article IV section 3, concening absence of the Supreme Court Justices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Senate takes responsibility to draft a law defining "Absence" and the actions that must be taken when an official is absent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By majority, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Definition of "Absent"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The President is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 2 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Supreme Court Justice is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 3 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Senator is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 2 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Replacements&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Vice President may stand in for the President, when the President is deemed absent, or if the President asks him to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Deputy Senator may stand in for a Senator, when the Senator is deemed absent, or if the Senator asks him to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Supreme court currently has no deputies. If, in future, such a deputy position (or similar) exists, then such a deputy may stand in for a Justice, when the Justice is deemed absent, or if the Justice asks him to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- There is an upper limit of 1 week if the absence is not requested, 2 weeks if requested. After that time the relevant government body must hold elections to fill the position on a permanent basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senate Disbandment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- As Per the Consitution, Article III, Section 7: "Should half or more of the Senate become absent, the Senate shall be disbanded." The Supreme Court must hold elections to fill the positions on a permanent basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Relevant Government Body" for elections&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Supreme court is responsible for the Presidency and Senate.&lt;BR&gt;- The Senate is responisble for the Supreme Court. If the Senate is unable to deal with this, then President can deal with the Supreme Court, as a backup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Senate is of the opinion that fixed deadlines will assist to remove the confusion around when a government member is deemed absent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This law will allow for deputies to fill the shoes of their superior, for a temporary basis, to keep the government from waiting on a particular official to make decisions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It also means that after prolonged absence, an election should be called to replace positions that have become vacant due to absence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Any thoughts/comments?</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 08:28:14 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Comedy Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>Article of Law #2 Official Vote Thread</title><link>http://www.1bcciv.com/Topic2237631-93-1.aspx</link><description>This thread is for voting of the following proposed draft of an Article of Law:&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PREAMBLE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under Article III Section 5 of the Constitution, the task to "Alter the Articles of Law" falls to the Senate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further, consideration must be given to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Article III Sections 6 and 7, concerning absence of Senators and their deputies.&lt;BR&gt;Article II section 6, concerning absence of the President and Vice president.&lt;BR&gt;Article IV section 3, concening absence of the Supreme Court Justices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Senate takes responsibility to draft a law defining "Absence" and the actions that must be taken when an official is absent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DECISION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By majority, the Senate decides the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Definition of "Absent"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The President is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 2 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Supreme Court Justice is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 3 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Senator is condsidered absent if he fails to respond to a critical issue within 2 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Replacements&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Vice President may stand in for the President, when the President is deemed absent, or if the President asks him to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- A Deputy Senator may stand in for a Senator, when the Senator is deemed absent, or if the Senator asks him to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Supreme court currently has no deputies. If, in future, such a deputy position (or similar) exists, then such a deputy may stand in for a Justice, when the Justice is deemed absent, or if the Justice asks him to.  If there is no such deputy position and both Justices are absent during a period where their input is required, the President shall appoint an "Interrim Justice" to fulfill the Supreme Court's duties only as far as is required for the game to continue.  After this has been accomplished, the Interrim Justice is to step down and elections for the two Supreme Court Justice seats shall be organized by the Senate as usual.  The Interrim Justice may not be a current member of the Presidency or the Senate (including Vice President and Deputy positions).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- There is an upper limit of 1 week if the absence is not requested, 2 weeks if requested. After that time the relevant government body must hold elections to fill the position on a permanent basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senate Disbandment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- As Per the Consitution, Article III, Section 7: "Should half or more of the Senate become absent, the Senate shall be disbanded." The Supreme Court must hold elections to fill the positions for the remainder of the Senate's term of office.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Relevant Government Body" for elections&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Supreme court is responsible for the Presidency and Senate.&lt;BR&gt;- The Senate is responisble for the Supreme Court. If the Senate is unable to deal with this, then President can deal with the Supreme Court, as a backup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;JUSTIFICATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Senate is of the opinion that fixed deadlines will assist to remove the confusion around when a government member is deemed absent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This law will allow for deputies to fill the shoes of their superior, for a temporary basis, to keep the government from waiting on a particular official to make decisions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It also means that after prolonged absence, an election should be called to replace positions that have become vacant due to absence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All votes are to be cast in person with a call of Aye in favor, Nay if not in favor, or Abstain if indifferent to the proposed draft.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:29:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>psweetman1590</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>