1BC Civ Forums / Civilization IV Discussion / 1BC CivIV BTS Multi Team Battle / Senate Floor / Dgame Archive / Tech Trading proposal. / Latest Posts

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

Bolan Longpants — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:28:16 GMT

Well, if you guys wanna pick on France in the future the best country for trades would be Germany. I am fine with everything as long as we don't trade away alphabet and sailing.:w00t:

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

Comedy Dave — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:39:40 GMT

Given the trade to Egypt has now occurred, how about the following?

France

We give Polytheism, we get Archery.

Germany

We give (something), we get Archery (need to check the trades)

New trade tables are up with the end of turn 130, any other thoughts? We might be able to get Meditation from our friends in Egypt.

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

psweetman1590 — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:00:00 GMT

I'd rather aquire Archery or Agriculture from the Germans than the French, but otherwise it looks good.

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

Comedy Dave — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:43 GMT

Hey Sword,

Sorry for the delays on the response.

1.) Techs:

Inca

Won't trade: "We don't like you enough".

France

We give Polytheism, we get Agriculture OR Archery (I think we go for Archery)

Egypt

We give Monotheism, we get Agriculture AND Priesthood.

Germans

Won't trade Maths yet. We would already have Agriculture and Archery from above trades.

Arabs,

Won't trade Priesthood yet. We would already have Agriculture and Archery from above trades.

I think we make the trades with Egypt and France and then see where we stand again.

2.) Next construction.

I think we might want to consider building a wonder in Bibracte. Vienne, perhaps start on a military unit, and Tolosa may need a worker of its own.

3.) Barbs

I think we need to ignore them in the short term, but considering expanding out our empire so that the culture borders prevent new barb cities forming. When we have a slightly more advanced military we can send out a group of units to capture/destroy any barb cities (dependent on location)

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

swordinthestorm — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 07:41:55 GMT

I think there has been a slight loss of focus here, Veto's and Clerks are all very well and good but there is a need to respond to requests made by our president in relation to the game. The open border request has been met and approved but there are other proposals and requests that i feel we must address. (In order of what i feel to be priority)

1 Tech trading is and will from now on be a large issue and i myself am very concerned about what we trade and who with. Can Somebody with warlords PLEASE examine our best options.

2 Will we build a wonder, a settler or something else in our citys, The next 10 turns will see all 3 of our citys complete their projects, What will we build next?

3 Barb citys. Do we ignore them and leave them till later? Or do we address the problem NOW? I know biz and jerm are for the former but how does the rest of the senate and the SC feel about this?

RE: Tech Trading proposal.

Comedy Dave — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:58:56 GMT

Hey mate, that's a good idea. I'll try and get a look at the save in the next day or so if I get a chance and see what's possible... :)

Tech Trading proposal.

swordinthestorm — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:34:45 GMT

I dont mean to usurpe anyone athority but i want i get this whole tech trading proposal wrapped up. I have highlighted what i believe to be the best options, in this respect i would like for some one with warlords to see if these are even an option.

[quote]

Therefore reviewing my statement against everyone elses here is a possible outline for our Trading.

Monotheism To Egypt for Meditation or Priesthood

Monotheism to Arabia For Agriculture or Archery

Mysticism to Germany For Agriculture or Archery

Polytheism to France for Agriculture or Archery.[/quote]