Senate Naming Idea
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


«««123

Senate Naming IdeaExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
3/11/2007 5:46 PM


First Lieutenant

First LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst LieutenantFirst Lieutenant

Last Seen:
9/17/2008 9:34 PM


Posts: 1,966
Visits: 4,411

Baaah!  I'm slightly agast by your reffering to Sean as your "Queen".  Starting to sound like a state prison in here.
3/14/2007 1:07 PM


Leader

LeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeader

Last Seen:
5/8/2007 12:20 AM


Posts: 978
Visits: 4,006

There hasn't been much discussion on this topic lately, yet there has been no consenus either.

I am prepared to open a poll with the following options:

Districts - A, B, C, D, E
Wards - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th
Houses - Warmax, Zyn, Olaf, Scorpius, Terminal
Clans - Hill, Grassland, Coast, Forest, Lake
Abstain - Other

I will wait approx. 24 hours for further nominations and then start a poll. The poll will run 72 hours. I had considered starting the poll immediately but I would like to allow some time for further nominations. I had considered running the poll at the same time as the Presidential elections. I would like to conclude the poll on this so that the naming of the Senate is decided before the Presidential elections; that way if the position of President is uncontested we can open up Senate campaigns immediately.

3/14/2007 1:47 PM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 1:58 PM


Posts: 4,390
Visits: 10,911

Clans - Hill, Grassland, Coast, Forest, Lake

Who proposed that one?  And where's my tribal idea (Gaul, Welsh, Scots, Brittons, Cisalpina)?

3/14/2007 2:28 PM


Dr Fluffy

Dr Fluffy

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:39 PM


Posts: 1,503
Visits: 3,572

And where's my tribal idea (Gaul, Welsh, Scots, Brittons, Cisalpina)?

I am a simple peasant etc., etc. and I like your idea.

3/14/2007 2:44 PM


die with honor

die with honor

Last Seen:
Today @ 11:47 AM


Posts: 4,619
Visits: 16,395

Wherever I may Roam


on land on sea or foam ...
you will always find me singing this song ...
Show me the way to go home!

Far more elegant ... and easier to remember after a night of imbibing adult beverage

I'll get up to speed here eventually ... I'll even reload the game if I ever find the damn disk.

Oh, I like legacy players ... but then I are one.
3/14/2007 3:17 PM


General

General

Last Seen:
11/18/2008 10:51 PM


Posts: 3,789
Visits: 5,126

Hmm, havent (cant use apostropies it seems, a small line opens at the bottom and it asks for a FIND order...) been reading this too closely, maybe tonight. My suggestion would be to have 5 game-related seats to highlight what the candidate thinks he specializes in. Offtopofhead: culture, religion, science, military, um, and another one... Or expansion, research, economy, warfare, um, and another one.

These *should be* fluid. If there is a conflict pending, it would be possible for e.g. the science candidates to become rejected for election by a certain % of abstain votes, though it will take someone else to figure out how to get 2 or 3 military specialists elected...

I think this would far better make senators representatives of the people. Please note that I'm not suggesting that there will be different functions attributed to different senators: once elected, they'll all do the exact same thing. Except that we'll know where their hearts lie.
3/14/2007 6:39 PM


Leader

LeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeaderLeader

Last Seen:
5/8/2007 12:20 AM


Posts: 978
Visits: 4,006

Zig, one of the other options I considered was using the 5 original Civ3 traits - Religious, Industrious, Expansive, Scientific, Militaristic. Would that be suitable or should they be closer to Civ4 specific areas of responsibilities?

The 5 tribes - Gaul, Welsh, Scots, Brittons, Cisalpina - are noted and will be included in the poll when it is run.

3/14/2007 11:01 PM


General

General

Last Seen:
11/18/2008 10:51 PM


Posts: 3,789
Visits: 5,126

I think *everybody* is Industrious in Civ4. Forge and Factory are always at the top of my list anyway, and without sufficient Workers you're just not going to be competitive. So here's the five I'd like to suggest:

Expansion (Settlers, Culture, occasional "military flipping" of a nearby city)

Infrastructure (Workers, Improvements, Economy)

Military (Barracks &c, Units, military campaigns)

Religion (Temples &c, Missionaries, religious campaigns)

Research (Libraries &c, 110% research would be nice)

Perhaps in drastic times (or indeed, just prior to drastic times) a Military candidate might run for a non-Military seat and color the Senate in war paint. On the other hand, if a military campaign dwindles and our production is going to waste for too long, there could be an Infrastructure revival, with warmongers being run out.

I think it would be easier to keep track of everything if we attach at least some meaning to these Senate seats. Could be that's just me...
3/15/2007 9:27 AM


Dr Fluffy

Dr Fluffy

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:39 PM


Posts: 1,503
Visits: 3,572

Now I am confused. I thought I understood that no one senator would be responsible for any  particular aspect of the game. If this is true, then naming the seats as Mr Zig suggests would be horribly misleading. However, if I have got the wrong end of the stick, then it would seem sensible to name seats such that they reflect the responsibility they represent.