Ok screw the constitution.
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


««123»»

Ok screw the constitution.Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
6/10/2007 2:30 AM


Grognard fantôme

Grognard fantôme

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 9:10 PM


Posts: 7,240
Visits: 9,605

Bismarck2990 (6/9/2007)
Nay. The main problem is that the game is played on Warlords. I won't agree to this just so we can substitute that.

I'll insist on turning this on its head.

The main problem is that most of the citizens do not own and play Warlords!

6/10/2007 10:03 AM


G'day

G'day

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 6:20 AM


Posts: 2,755
Visits: 6,898

Scip
The main problem is that most of the citizens do not own and play Warlords!

That may be true, but I kinda think now that there is just not enough people who are interested or willing to dedicate the time to keep this going.

Your quote from before Scip says it all...

. . or we could just dispense with the whole representative democracy idea, and use a simple direct participatory democracy . . .

If we go down that track, it will end up the 1BC Mongoose game, No offence to Mongoose. He has done a great job thus far as president, and so far there has not been any real competition. (Tosk did not have Warlords at the time during his bid, and it remains to be seen if people vote for Tora instead of Mongoose this time round). We will end up with 1 member playing the turns, and others just chipping in when they feel like it, with no obligation.

I think that most of us have a life outside of 1BC and that can infringe on dedicating time to the DGame. We need people who can commit for at least a few weeks at a time to serve out their term. Many people's computer time is already taken up with Dynasty games or PBEM games, so it gets harder to find 30mins a day to keep up with the DGame and post threads.

We need to determine the following:

Are there enough members who can commit time to fill the positions in this DGame?

If not, does that mean we need to reduce the number of positions required to keep the game running, or do we need to come up with a new system, where there is still debate and involvement, without it becoming a 1-man show.

Tosk's idea for a Clerk could work, but I would like it run through the system officially, so we get time to discuss and outline exactly how that could work. Again we would need someone dedicated and diligent enough to chase everything up.

6/10/2007 12:05 PM


General

General

Last Seen:
11/18/2008 10:51 PM


Posts: 3,789
Visits: 5,126

If you want a head count, then sure, here is mine...

I will NOT commit to being president or judge, ever.[/period]

I WILL commit to being vice-president or deputy senator, if I'm shadowing for someone reliable.

I MAY commit to being senator, if I think someone else is doing a particularly lousy job, or if I think my insights are needed to make sure we research fast enough (not that senators have much say over that yet ).

The idea for a clerkship has been proffered before, but it kinda fizzled then. I think it would greatly help if we had this safety net and eliminated all these needless delays.

Another idea to reduce the enormous strain of office on our fledgling population would be to make do with one judge with one deputy. The deputy could double as clerk. Again, if I'm shadowing for someone reliable, I WILL commit to being deputy judge. The arguments against having one judge instead of two seem strictly academic, with two judges missing...
6/10/2007 12:26 PM
Bismarcko' Magnifico

Bismarcko' Magnifico

Last Seen:
11/16/2008 2:20 PM


Posts: 1,056
Visits: 4,828

Scip, I don't see how that was any different from what I said...

CD, I have the time to contribute, but not the means to do so. The current lack of involvement by our citizenry and members of government, is mainly the result of what myself and Scip have pointed at above (lack of Warlord able members). I've also pointed out in other threads, how this game is basically us just gathered around the forum, watching Mongoose play the game (even claiming it to be a 'Spectator's Game' rather).

My previous proposals were made to promote involvement by including the senate briefly before the sessions are actually played. However, the discussion surrounding that draft died out right after goose (who is the current president) stated a reply, favoring it after the proper edits were made. In my mind, this was perfect to avoid future: "Hey.. maybe we could've been more involved if this game was played with Vanilla," comments... not to mention, give the senator/citizen more reason to actually stick around (which is severely lacking with the current setup).

Look at it like this:

Which scenario matches you?

A.) Would you be more interested in sticking around if you were just watching somebody play a game?

B.) Would you be more interested in sticking around if you participated in a game?

You could argue that most citizens are busy with "real life," and that's the reason they haven't been around. However, my feelings are that there's no reason for them to indulge further with the current setting... In all honesty, this DGame is not something I consider so time consuming, that it detracts from the overall amount of time I would've normally spent browsing the threads here normally (aside from the Presidency).

The Senate, which is probably the most flexible body in regards to time, shouldn't have problems keeping their members active if the only problem is time. The main problem, in my opinion, is that there's no reason to actually contribute as there is rarely anything for us to do.

I will also go to say, that when most issues that require our involvement are brought up, it is usually forced by other members to actually attempt to revive some interest in the job and game. I shouldn't be the only one who sees the problem with that.

6/10/2007 12:33 PM
Bismarcko' Magnifico

Bismarcko' Magnifico

Last Seen:
11/16/2008 2:20 PM


Posts: 1,056
Visits: 4,828

The idea for a clerkship has been proffered before, but it kinda fizzled then. I think it would greatly help if we had this safety net and eliminated all these needless delays.


Yes. I've brought it up before and I believe it would be great to avoid delays. I also agree that the current setup which requires two judges is unfavorable, if you were to factor in the actual interest for the game thus far. The clerk would be great in that aspect, however, I'm not in favor of completely tossing out the whole system which is in place at the current time.

Wanted to include this so you wouldn't feel like I ignored your post in my above post... was already writing my own response to other comments before this one popped up.
6/10/2007 1:14 PM


die with honor

die with honor

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 12:24 PM


Posts: 4,619
Visits: 16,386

OK ... my fault ... "Screw the Constitution" was a truly bad title for this thread.
I can see now that it got people feeling like I was advocating the total over throw of the current game/system ... this was not my intention.
I was simply throwing myself out to see if the community wanted someone to be a fall back guy in the event polls were not posted, finalized, or any other "dirt work", that was one or two days behind, because the "authorized" official had not been around for a couple days.

This is my little unofficial poll, noon next Saturday I'll add up the yea's and nay's and if the yea's win I'll petition the government to officially enact this into law, or whatever, if the nay's win I'll shut up and go back to being an interested observer ... no harm, no foul.
6/10/2007 2:00 PM


Grognard fantôme

Grognard fantôme

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 9:10 PM


Posts: 7,240
Visits: 9,605

If we go down that track, it will end up the 1BC Mongoose game . . .

Not necessarily. We have something like 25 or 30 citizens. But only a handful are "part of the government," (5 Senators, 5 Deputies, 2 SCs, 1 Pres, is their a Vice Pres?).

The problems we have suffered IMO have to do with guys not being around to deal with their piece of the bureacracy. This despite the fact that, we have more than once had referendums and such that manage to get 10 to 20 votes, a true quorum. Also, we've had plenty of activity among the role-playing crowd.

So, I guess I would actually correct myself a bit. I think the lack of citizens who own Warlords is a factor, but I think too much bureacracy is the main factor. If we had 100 citizens, then yes, having a system to prevent bedlam would be necessary, but with under 40 citizens in the society it is an unnecessary layer of effort and obligation/

Possible solution? Keep the Constitution, but consider all citizens to be "Senators" for all practical purposes. A quorum is all that is needed for the "Senate" (meaning the citizenry) to do anything. The Pres still has to get permission from the populace for whatever he currently has to get permission for, nothing as far as the possible role of the populace to influence events in the game would change, except that the populace would be more structurally engaged with the matters fo state. The 72 hour time frames for voting etc, all sound fine, but just take away the bureacratic layer of having Senatorial elections that nobody runs for, and give power to the PEOPLE!

The SC Judges have done a great job in getting the basic structure of the DGame set up, including the Constitution, and are clearly long-term committed to the game. But like the rest of us, it is a pain to have to log on here EVERY DAY (or even necessarily EVERY week) to make sure you don't have some "chore" to take care of.

Possible solution? Whatever ongoing daily "maintenance" duties the SC Judges are obligated to, allow anyone to do it. At the end of the day, a referendum is the ultimate authority in any democracy, so why not just take away the obligation for anyone to participate more actively, and open the door for everyone to participate more actively?

6/10/2007 2:29 PM


Dr Fluffy

Dr Fluffy

Last Seen:
Today @ 4:33 AM


Posts: 1,500
Visits: 3,566

For what it's worth, I'll stick my little contribution in. I have been fairly active at CiviliZed, but not here, because:

*The Constitution is dense, lengthy, and obscure - sorry, but it is.

* The Senate has nothing definite to do - yes, they can define things to do, but they haven't because they lack direction and leadership. It is a basic and fundamental fault.

* Using the Warlords expansion has created a sense of uninvolvement - argue as much as you like but using "Warlords" was a mistake. Personally I would have become far more involved if it were vanilla, but I feel marginalised, unable even to download a save.

* There is a curious lack of involvement. I cannot explain this. Mongoose has been a fine President, and yet the only thing I remember about the expansion of the country is that our first ship was called "Doomed". At least I think it was. The rest I don't care about. Why? Is it just me?

* What with the disgraceful abscence of the Supreme Court and the flailing-about of the Senate (with nothing happening except obscure and uninteresting discussion to the uninvolved) anyone looking in would have rightfully thought "what a bloody mess"; is it any wonder that the thing has hit a mudbank and stalled horribly?

* I don't want to be President. Ok, ha ha, but think - a game such as this should invlove people to the extent that they want to participate. In fact, I couldn't care less. Why is that? Is it my fault? (possibly, yes) But why was Mongoose unopposed last term? A healthy game should have lots of candidates.

* Prove me wrong. PLEASE prove me wrong. But something tells me this ain't gonna make it. In fact..... let's be realistic here...... how long will the "Doomed" float"?

*"Screw the constitution" - maybe not such an ill-judged call after all? Just perhaps the only way of rescuing this Dgame? Heck, I'm probably being too pessimistic, but something drastic needs to happen.

6/10/2007 7:12 PM


DG: Hopeful Wanderer

DG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful WandererDG: Hopeful Wanderer

Last Seen:
10/3/2008 12:02 PM


Posts: 681
Visits: 2,435

The above points are valid.

I would like to throw my hat in for involvement; however, it is only for the summer and highly volitile (if I spelled that correctly).