I'm simply trying to set you straight about who can and can't write laws, as you seem adamant about doing so. 

It has not.  Yet.  By trying to write Laws (which is the domain of the Senate) and attempting to tie the Princeps to the Supreme Court, you would be, should these things come to pass.

I have.  Altering the Articles of Law is the job of the Senate, not the Court.

Correction: I have threatened to remove the Court for infringing on the duties of the Senate.  Which the Senate has every right - nay, duty - to do.  That's why the clause about our being able to dismiss a Justice is there.

You mean this one?

Note it says that you may present proposals for the constitution.  It says nothing about you making them.  Furthermore, the Articles of Law are seperate from the Constitution, and so you still can't do a thing about those, except strike them down if they are unconstitutional. 

Have I answered all of your points satisfactorily?  I'm trying very hard to remain civil, but it does seem to me that you're trying to twist my words to make it sound like I'm either not reading the Constitution properly (I'm quite sure its you who's not reading it properly) or that I'm against the Court acting with presence (I'm not.  I'm in favor of people who want to make a difference through their job.). 

I'd have to agree with PSweet - the role of the Supreme Court is not to make laws, or alter the constitution without popular vote. The Senate approved articles of law which work in conjunction with the Constitution, although the constitution is the higher level of authority.

Show me your proposals, and then we can have a discussion.

I'll be back later to write a better response.

Apologies for my quick response earlier, I did not mean to imply you were going to make changes without holding votes, sorry if you took it that way. I was just trying to state where various responsibilities lie, and had literally 2 mins to try and think of and write a response.

To avoid this degenerating into picking over points, I think the best route forward is for the Justices to get together a draft of their proposals, so that the senate and citizenry can take a look and discuss with you as appropriate. In the meantime, let's get on with the game, there is nothing I can see holding us up there.