Third City Placement Discussion
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


«««23456»»»

Third City Placement DiscussionExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
6/27/2007 5:43 PM


sweetP

sweetP

Last Seen:
1/4/2009 12:11 AM


Posts: 4,812
Visits: 8,435

Well, how about responding to his question, TOR?...
6/27/2007 6:00 PM


Prince of The MAELRI

Prince of The MAELRI

Last Seen:
7/20/2007 11:37 AM


Posts: 1,715
Visits: 1,843

psweetman1590 (6/27/2007)
Well, how about responding to his question, TOR?...

I saw no question in his statement. Does anyone see a "?" in it?
6/27/2007 6:06 PM


sweetP

sweetP

Last Seen:
1/4/2009 12:11 AM


Posts: 4,812
Visits: 8,435

It was an implied question.  As if you needed to be told....
6/27/2007 6:13 PM


Prince of The MAELRI

Prince of The MAELRI

Last Seen:
7/20/2007 11:37 AM


Posts: 1,715
Visits: 1,843

psweetman1590 (6/27/2007)
It was an implied question. As if you needed to be told....

I see nothing but some person attempting to mock me.
6/27/2007 6:35 PM


sweetP

sweetP

Last Seen:
1/4/2009 12:11 AM


Posts: 4,812
Visits: 8,435

but when I look at it I cannot help but wonder why we would build not one but *two* towns on top of cattle. Perhaps in your many games you have seen special benefits to this, benefits that more casual players have not discovered yet. Please, do share your insights and let us bask in your radiance.

As in, "why should we build two towns on top of cattle?" And, "Are there any special benefits to doing so?"

I advise that you lose the hostile and defensive edge here.  We're playing a game that happens to involve a large amount of discussion, and you seem to be taking offense at someone wanting to discuss the wisdom of what you put forth.

6/27/2007 7:56 PM


Prince of The MAELRI

Prince of The MAELRI

Last Seen:
7/20/2007 11:37 AM


Posts: 1,715
Visits: 1,843

psweetman1590 (6/27/2007)


I advise that you lose the hostile and defensive edge here. We're playing a game that happens to involve a large amount of discussion, and you seem to be taking offense at someone wanting to discuss the wisdom of what you put forth.

And I would suggest you and others lose the hostile and offensive edge.
I've never taken offense to discussing anything. I do however take offense at the way certain members blatantly are hostile to anything I should suggest. I have ignored being called a liar and other things, and have continued to give constructive advice and suggestions, unlike some I could mention who seem bent on disruption.
6/27/2007 8:14 PM


sweetP

sweetP

Last Seen:
1/4/2009 12:11 AM


Posts: 4,812
Visits: 8,435

And meanwhile you ignore the first and more important part of my post.  Seriously, it seems quite dodgy that you avoid so many questions this way.
6/27/2007 8:48 PM


Prince of The MAELRI

Prince of The MAELRI

Last Seen:
7/20/2007 11:37 AM


Posts: 1,715
Visits: 1,843

psweetman1590 (6/27/2007)
And meanwhile you ignore the first and more important part of my post. Seriously, it seems quite dodgy that you avoid so many questions this way.

Mayhap I'm just getting sick of repeating myself. I have from the beginning said:
TORARADICAL (6/21/2007)
All but 2 are coastal, no overlap, and only a very few areas of land that won't be directly used (but will be easily covered by cultural boundaries.
6/27/2007 8:52 PM


Sword of Doom...

Sword of Doom...

Last Seen:
2 days ago @ 8:46 AM


Posts: 2,316
Visits: 19,970

OK, everybody... Let's take a couple steps back...

Obviously, there is quite a bit of animosity flowing around, and I'm pretty sure a good deal of it has nothing to do with our situation here.

I'm not really sure about what's gone on in the past with some of you guys (And I don't really care to, there is enough drama here), but 1bc is not going to be the battleground for fights brought here from other sites.

Now, as to what's going on here, I'm not going to deal with it in the open. Perhaps I was wrong to call out Tora the way I did about his reply to Zig, perhaps not, but in either case, I'm going to be sending out pm's later tonight. This is not going to continue in this fashion.