Should we start over with BtS?
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


12345»»»

Should we start over with BtS?Expand / Collapse
I think we should
Poll ResultsVotes
keep playing this Dgame with Warlords.
0%
0
start a new Dgame using Beyond the Sword with one team.
 
33.33%
6
start a new Dgame using Beyond the Sword with two teams, competing against each other.
 
55.56%
10
Whatever you do, I don't plan on participating.
 
11.11%
2
Member Votes: 18, Anonymous Votes: 0. You don't have permission to vote within this poll.
Author
Message
8/21/2007 3:58 PM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 2:27 PM


Posts: 4,105
Visits: 10,260

Expanding on the following discussion:

Discussion

Note, if you don't plan on participating, vote for the last option instead of giving us the impression you want to take part in one of the above. 

8/21/2007 5:42 PM


Elite Warlord

Elite Warlord

Last Seen:
11/6/2007 2:46 AM


Posts: 404
Visits: 409

Judging from the mentioned discussion thread there might not be enough interest to run two teams....I'm voting for the one team option because of that, but wouldn't mind two teams if there is enough interest.
8/21/2007 6:29 PM


General

General

Last Seen:
8/14/2008 11:44 PM


Posts: 3,773
Visits: 5,087

If we have one smaller Dynasty-style team, we may not need all that much interest; it will also be less likely to cause delays in gameplay than 2 Democratic teams, or even just one...
8/21/2007 6:45 PM
Bismarcko' Magnifico

Bismarcko' Magnifico

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 6:04 AM


Posts: 1,001
Visits: 4,650

As I indicated in the above listed thread, I'm very interested in seeing another game with two teams.  However, I can still be counted to participate in whatever is decided.
8/22/2007 12:32 PM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 2:27 PM


Posts: 4,105
Visits: 10,260

Well it is telling that there are no votes to continue with what we are doing.  Looks like BtS is the popular way to go but the question is whether or not we do the team way or not. 
8/22/2007 12:59 PM


Warlord

WarlordWarlordWarlordWarlordWarlordWarlordWarlordWarlord

Last Seen:
4/16/2008 4:00 PM


Posts: 129
Visits: 347

I'm getting BtS next month. Starting over with BtS and possibly reviewing the Constitution for any tweaks to help the game run a little smoother sounds good to me.

A two team game sounds like a lot of fun. Could be a bit tricky on one site. Maybe an intersite game between 1bc and Civilized, perhaps? I like the idea of one democracy and another form of gov't for the second team. Two democracies just puts a bad taste in my mouth.

8/22/2007 2:21 PM


Udderly ridiculous

Udderly ridiculous

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:00 PM


Posts: 3,199
Visits: 3,109

I would be interested in joining if you guys would permit. 

I only have a 1/2 vague idea of how this all works though.

8/22/2007 4:45 PM
Settler

SettlerSettlerSettlerSettlerSettlerSettlerSettlerSettler

Last Seen:
7/30/2008 8:11 PM


Posts: 3
Visits: 12

I have been turned onto this forum by my friend Nuclearcow, and I too would like to see about being entered into the coming Democracy game. Or put on a waiting list perhaps if it is already full?

Thanks!
Morienglyndwr
8/22/2007 7:09 PM


Drill and Drill Now!!!!!!!!

Drill and Drill Now!!!!!!!!

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:15 PM


Posts: 4,775
Visits: 26,162

Well anyways, whatever is done, it seems to me that the way this past D-game was set up, there was more focus in how the government itself functioned, as opposed to how the game was played. Is that what is wanted?