Should we start over with BtS?

Should we start over with BtS?

1BC Civ Forums

1BC Civ Forums

Home

FAQ Links

Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )

Recent Posts

Popular Topics

Home » Civilization IV Discussion » 1BC CivIV BTS Multi Team Battle » Dgame Archive » Town Square » Should we start over with BtS?

42 posts, Page 5 of 5

«««1 2 3 4 5

Should we start over with BtS?

Expand / Collapse

I think we should

Poll Results

Votes

keep playing this Dgame with Warlords.

0%

0

start a new Dgame using Beyond the Sword with one team.

33.33%

6

start a new Dgame using Beyond the Sword with two teams, competing against each other.

55.56%

10

Whatever you do, I don't plan on participating.

11.11%

2

Member Votes: 18, Anonymous Votes: 0. You don't have permission to vote within this poll.

Author

Message

9/1/2007 8:53 PM

General

General

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 12:59 PM

Posts: 3,776
Visits: 5,100

[shrugs]There was an intersite game a while back; everybody called that a D-game, no one called that a PBEM game. This can go whichever way we want (as nothing has been filled in yet ). It can be a D-game but with one unpredictable civ in the mix...[/shrugs]
-- Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong.

9/2/2007 7:41 PM

Elite Pathogen

Last Seen:
2 days ago @ 7:16 PM

Posts: 4,279
Visits: 10,640

Instead of team names, what if we just had an open forum where anyone who wants to present a government type can do so. There would be ground rules like the system has to accomodate 1 turn per day and anything else that we can think of. We can then have a contest where each person joins a team. The top four teams remain while the others drop off (if we start with four, then we'd skip that first step). Then the remaining players (who are teamless) join one of the four remaining teams and the top two are the systems we stick with and we somehow get the teams evenly distributed. That is of course the tricky bit isn't it. Anyway, it's a thought, though not very thought through I'll admit. How do we evenly dispurse everyone so one team isn't full of all the players? We can't have one team have 7 players while the other has two. This is the fundamental flaw but I think it can be figured out. We could do a lottery, though the problem with this is that everyone could end up on the team they didn't want to end up on. We could have a first come first serve. Once a team reaches a limit it, no one can join it until the other team has also reached the limit. Thoughts?
-- -A government that is powerful enough to do anything for us is powerful enough to do anything to us. -Fred Thompson -There are two races of people, the decent and the indecent. - Victor Frankel -They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. - Benjamin Franklin Consequences

« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

42 posts, Page 5 of 5

«««1 2 3 4 5

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse

Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)

No members currently viewing this topic.

Forum Moderators: Admin, Sean, Zone, Winner, maniacalmonkey, Comedy Dave, Zigeuner, Terminal_Civ-er, cleopatra143, RabiAkiva, Tosk, mongoose201

Permissions

Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 5:26am

Execution: 0.250. 13 queries. Compression Disabled.

© 2005 Take-Two Interactive Software and its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. Sid Meier's Civilization IV, Civ, Civilization, 2K Games, the 2K Games logo, and Take-Two Interactive Software are all trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Developed by Firaxis Games. Firaxis Games and the Firaxis Games logo are a registered trademark of Firaxis Games, Inc.