Offshore Drilling time?
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


«««56789

Offshore Drilling time?Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
7/10/2008 7:28 AM


Udderly ridiculous

Udderly ridiculous

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 9:11 PM


Posts: 3,613
Visits: 4,363

I was refering to progressive generations getting progressively complex teachings handed to them aspect. This kind of thinking is flawed bcz it assumes that a human being at any given point of time can not handle the whole truth.
I could hijack this thread with a big response, so I'll keep it to a minimum, unless you want another thread to debate this.

You must learn 1st grade math before you can learn 2nd. 5th before 6th, etc. You cannot skip straight to calculus because you can handle calculus, can you?

If most of mankind was once slaughtering each other for various petty things, it would be hard to convince them of higher-teachings until they mastered the 'stop slaughtering each other' piece. 2nd grade after 1st.

Thats all I'm going to say unless you want another thread to debate this further.
7/10/2008 8:33 AM


Grognard fantôme

Grognard fantôme

Last Seen:
Today @ 7:08 AM


Posts: 7,242
Visits: 9,608

I agree with you on the waste point Muk, and I also agree with you on the learning by steps point Muk. What point you're making about Bahai I do not comprehend LC!

Basically, I still stand pretty solid on my hypothesis: Humanity and Earth would be better off in the long-run if there were fewer of us humans; not ~7 billion, and not more of us.

7/10/2008 12:55 PM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:58 PM


Posts: 4,390
Visits: 10,911

The difference is the effect.  Micro defines what is affected by a single person/family/community and macro by what is affected by Nations/continents/the world at large.  Killing an animal for food is different than wiping out an entire species.  When the species is gone, so is the food... at least from that animal.  Cutting down a few trees to build a house won't have any effect but when a rainforest is gone to make room for human development, it's gone.  Also, on the micro scale, we have invented farming and Animal Husbandry so that those animals don't go away.  Shouldn't we also, if the macro is the same, find ways of preserving systems for our benefit?  I'm not saying we should not use the resources on the earth, in fact, I have no problems with logging, fishing, farming or population growth (if you'd read the rest of this thread, you'd know that).  Do you think it's not a good idea to preserve anything?  

I don't get your point about eating dirty bagels

7/10/2008 1:00 PM


Culture-Monger

Culture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-MongerCulture-Monger

Last Seen:
Today @ 1:42 PM


Posts: 6,243
Visits: 8,818

jerm (7/10/2008)

I don't get your point about eating dirty bagels .

ROFL! I thought I was the only one.
7/10/2008 1:57 PM
lame duck

lame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame duck

Last Seen:
11/17/2008 4:24 PM


Posts: 1,795
Visits: 4,325

I never said you have to eat them. I said I would go pick it up from under feet to stop it from being so sacralaged. But the bigger point is to take enough care not to drop that bagel in the first place.

NC, Growing up of a child & progress of greater humanity is not a good analogy. So please do go ahead and exponenciate, but dont jump from thread to thread. That just tends to confuse me. 

7/10/2008 2:29 PM


die with honor

die with honor

Last Seen:
Today @ 3:59 PM


Posts: 4,619
Visits: 16,390

ahem... formal education and intelligence are not mutually dependent.


Man does that ever need a QFE!!!

In my experience formal education (in the U.S. at least) is one of the greatest determents to natural intelligence as man has ever devised ... turning otherwise bright people into molded clones ... thank goodness we still have people who can take the learning and skip the indoctrination.

You must learn 1st grade math before you can learn 2nd. 5th before 6th, etc. You cannot skip straight to calculus because you can handle calculus, can you?


Were you my freshman counselor???
The one that told me I could not take algebra 1, algebra 2, plain and solid geometry in the same semester ... yes I did and I passed them all ... but I cheated ... I learned them outside the classroom ... I just needed to sit in for the transcript grade ... see -M-'s quote above.

Back on subject ... China is drilling 50 miles off our coast, Cuba is drilling a couple hundred yards off the Florida Keys ... it is no longer a question of hoarding *our* reserves it's a question of allowing others to steal it while we debate the issue ... don't ya think?
7/10/2008 3:06 PM
lame duck

lame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame ducklame duck

Last Seen:
11/17/2008 4:24 PM


Posts: 1,795
Visits: 4,325

Do you think it's not a good idea to preserve anything? 

My belief is that preservation will happen in the natural order. Much like whales were preserved out of brink due to emergence of alternatives, preservation of rainforrests is already on the way bcz our recordkeeping is shifting towards electronic media. Ask any paper mill company that has been struggling to make ends meet in the last few years if demand for paper is not on the decline.

Talking of preservation I find hypocritical, while I live in a consumer society that doesnt even take enough care about its bagels :p

7/11/2008 7:46 AM


Udderly ridiculous

Udderly ridiculous

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 9:11 PM


Posts: 3,613
Visits: 4,363

Quoting back a page:
I was refering to progressive generations getting progressively complex teachings handed to them aspect. This kind of thinking is flawed bcz it assumes that a human being at any given point of time can not handle the whole truth.

NC, Growing up of a child & progress of greater humanity is not a good analogy. So please do go ahead and exponenciate, but dont jump from thread to thread. That just tends to confuse me.
Oh boy. We could still hijack this thread easily on a big tangent. I'll try to be more brief than I could be. If we can just keep Roadkill away long enough to debate religion.

For the sake of debate, lets say that each of the main religions founders were all inspired by "God." From the Judeo-Christian-Muslim faiths... in the days of Abraham, if the Monotheistic concept of one God was foreign to most people, how could you teach them more advanced stuff if that one huge, main-point was hard to accept? By Moses's day, despite golden calfs, people were ready en mass for more. So 10 commandments were given, plus various other strict Mosaic laws as they perhaps needed them for whatever higher purpose. By Jesus's day, the people had that stuff down okay, though not perfect, so Jesus taught higher practices of loving thy neighbor, non-judgment, etc, etc and that the Mosaic law was no longer necessarily. People en mass were ready for more. Muslims could go further with Mohammad and the various higher teachings that most Westerns are ignorant of. Baha'is a step further perhaps, at least in each of their own minds.

If one doesn't have the moral basis to know that its wrong to kill another man merely because he angered you, will he readily accept higher teachings?

Go back in time quite a ways to older cultures. What if cultures are towards the extreme end of selfishness, greed, racism, elitism, sexist, etc, etc, etc, can you really teach them that women are equal in regards to man in spirituality? That your enemy is really equal in the eyes of God, despite sex, color of your body's skin, etc? Wealth, position of birth, title, etc is irrelevant compared to ones actions?

I could continue, but this is already longer than I intended. Are you sure you don't want your own thread for this debate?
7/11/2008 8:28 AM


Grognard fantôme

Grognard fantôme

Last Seen:
Today @ 7:08 AM


Posts: 7,242
Visits: 9,608

I totally see what you mean Nuke and it is IMO an excellent point.

In our primal human condition, we were (in general) astute 'ecologists,' and devoted 'democrats.' You don't hear of too many tyrannical, hierarchical, dynastic hunter-gatherer 'Empires.'

In short (and I'm generalizing liberally here) 'Civilization' had to teach us to be non-sustainable consumers of nature, to be mindless God-King followers, to be subjects. Certainly the psychosocial capacity for these mindless worldviews existed all along, but it took a major shift in social organization: basically packing a whole bunch of the average sheepol into a relatively small area, with a few of the most cunning and charismatic sheep-dog(s)/wolve(s) at the top of the pyramid filling their minds with nonsense.

We've been working out way out of that initial 'fall from grace' for about 10,000 years.