|
| |
Grognard fantôme
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 9:35 PM
Posts: 7,585 Visits: 9,899
|
| | That raises this question for me Nukau: where are these "speculators?" Who are these speculators? Are they all U.S. citizens? Do they all live in and work under the regulations of the U.S.? Or are some of them maybe Russians? Or maybe Venezeulans, or Chinese? Like I said, I'm no economist . . . but I'm reminded of one market-forces story about which I know a little bit because of working on the history of southern Africa a tad bit. Diamonds. They were worthless up till some time in the 19th century. Too hard to be worked with previously, and no obvious use. Began to change in more recent history, but then esp. because of a major marketing scheme (initially in Europe IMS but then also in N. Am) to pose Diamonds as the "Zeus" (or Hera?) of the gem pantheon. Timeless, pure, glasslike . . . In a matter of a couple generations the notion of the Diamond ring as an integral part of the "traditional" Euro White Wedding was born, and simultaneously DeBeers was buying up all the best known diamond-producing areas. The Russians got into the game in the 20th century. As you may know, these rocks are not cheap, but that is not because they are not plentiful. My understanding is that there are warehouses FULL of these rocks in Holland and Russian (and Australia too?). Their high value is largely artificial through two mechanisms (a) ongoing marketing campaign that started ~150 years ago and has people convinced that Diamonds are the most traditional, most meaningful, and most substantial betrothal gift; (b) hoarding by the producer. I know oil is a different kind of thing. If I hop in my car, I can be at the parking lot for my office in about 12 or 14 minutes, whereas it would take me about 19 minutes on my bike. Ironically though, for me in my special highly contrived circumstance (meaning I sought to live where I live for the specific purpose of biking to work) the bike vs the car work out to be about equal. When you add in the ~10 min to walk from the parking lot to the office it works out to be about equal to biking: door to door about 25 minutes either way, but then I don't sweat in the car. The faster I go in the car, the more I risk hurting someone, or getting a ticket. The faster I go on the bike the longer I live (assuming I'm riding safely, and not going fast weaving in and out of traffic! :w00t |
-- "'The front' is wherever you stop running away. Get used to it. This is what modern warfare looks like." K T Cat
Edited: 7/13/2008 3:36 PM by Scipio Africanus |  |  |
| |
| |
Impeached by a patch
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 7:22 AM
Posts: 1,839 Visits: 3,513
|
| cleopatra143 (7/10/2008) You are right in some respects but if I was a business owner (and I have been), the first thing I would do is cut the fat so to speak. Perhaps I am too idealistic. However I know that many airlines have already started charging customers for baggage, taking out in flight entertainment, carry less items, scheduling less flights, laying off personnel, etc. So they are trying it would seem, but probably not in the way they should. If you are facing an economic downturn, the last thing you want to do is start handing out bonus' and fat checks to the people at the top. I guess that's just me though. Too bad.
It would depend. If the marginal negative utility suffered (poorer management) by losing the CEOs is higher than the amount of money saved, it would not make sense to cut down those bonuses. A saving is only worth it if you can pull it off without losing even more revenue in the process.
A few years ago, the Swedish telecommunications giant Ericsson was in deep trouble. They offered Jorma Ollila, who at the time was the CEO of its Finnish rival Nokia, 1 billion crowns (about $100,000,000) just as an entry fee if he were to defect to Ericsson!
Did they offer him such a humongous fee because they were oppressive, bloodsucking, bourgeoise, Forbes-reading Capitalist pigdogs? No. They did it because they, for real, thought that it would benefit the company. This was Ollila, the guy who had turned Nokia from a small-time consumer electronics company into the world's foremost producer of mobile phones. They thought he could do the same to Ericsson, or if nothing else, his mere reputation would have caused the value of their stock to spike.
I'm all for regulation. I would even support international taxation. Tosk and jerm would probably consider me a commie pinko if we'd get to discuss serious economics. Still, what leftists easily forget is that, in an economy, nothing exists in a vacuum, everything is related to and a consequence of everything else. That which looks outrageously wasteful might be a consequence of something else that is hugely efficient.
If companies would really be overpaying their CEOs, they wouldn't stay in business for too long. Inefficient companies tend to get disqualified by natural selection. |
--
|  |  |
| |
| |
Grognard fantôme
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 9:35 PM
Posts: 7,585 Visits: 9,899
|
| | |
| | lame duck
      
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 11:44 AM
Posts: 1,802 Visits: 4,333
|
| | |
| |
Elite Pathogen
      
Last Seen: Today @ 7:47 PM
Posts: 4,494 Visits: 11,167
|
| | |
| | lame duck
      
Last Seen: Yesterday @ 11:44 AM
Posts: 1,802 Visits: 4,333
|
| | |
| |
Radical Centrist
Last Seen: Today @ 6:04 PM
Posts: 5,592 Visits: 27,821
|
| | |
| |
Udderly ridiculous
Last Seen: Today @ 9:56 PM
Posts: 3,925 Visits: 4,738
|
| | |
| |
Elite Pathogen
      
Last Seen: Today @ 7:47 PM
Posts: 4,494 Visits: 11,167
|
| | |
|
|
|