Three months after the China Quake
1BC Civ Forums
1BC Civ Forums
Home      Members   FAQ   Links
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      


«««12345»»»

Three months after the China QuakeExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
8/14/2008 6:56 PM


Udderly ridiculous

Udderly ridiculous

Last Seen:
Today @ 9:56 PM


Posts: 3,925
Visits: 4,738

I've touched that artillery piece that shot that nuclear round.

I tend to agree with Biz's description of Nationalism. Patriotism to me is loving your country and being proud of its history, etc. Nationalism is preferring your nation at the expense of others. That sorta thing.
8/14/2008 7:16 PM


Radical Centrist

Radical Centrist

Last Seen:
Today @ 6:04 PM


Posts: 5,592
Visits: 27,821

I think the bumperstickers.....actually I've never seen the bumperstickers, but the phrase I have heard is "Think for yourself, question authority".

Thinking for oneself, being as objective and realistic as possible, and expressing oneself in a civil, clear, and assertive way--including questioning authority--I think is what you actually mean LC.

That is exactly what I mean doc. What can I say, I was rushed this morning when I posted that. Specifically what I meant to say is "Questioning your government.... WHEN IT IS NECESSARY". Which fits with what you have so eloquently said.

8/14/2008 7:21 PM


Radical Centrist

Radical Centrist

Last Seen:
Today @ 6:04 PM


Posts: 5,592
Visits: 27,821

we'd firstly identify ourselves as Americans (or whatever other country you belong to). 

Actually I firstly identify myself as a human being... THEN an American. But who's counting!

Your statement about wars is very simplistic.  The only way there will ever be total peace on earth is when an iron fisted totalitarian regime rules it all. 

I disagree. But then, I guess I have more faith in humanity than you do!

 

Are you willing to trade freedom for peace?

No, of course not. I wish GWB felt the same way!   

Forget working together as a nation for common goals, I am working for all of humanity to make the world a better place, not just for this nation, but for all the peoples of the world.

Why in the world are these two mutually exclusive?

Well, they are not, but the latter does not require Nationalism as a motivating factor. I do not worship at the altar of Nationalism. I do not require it, it doesn't get me out of bed each day, that is what I am saying. Patriotic, yes, you betcha. But nationalistic, no, never!

The world is my playground.  

I am proud to be an American first and foremost.  I do not pretend that everything we have done in the world has been good (though I think our intentions were at least in the 20th Century) but I do believe this is the best damn country on the earth and if I didn't feel that way, I'd move to the one I thought that was.  What the hell is wrong with that?

Nothing, sir, nothing at all. But you know, good intentions pave the road to hell, you know this, right?

8/15/2008 12:37 AM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 7:47 PM


Posts: 4,494
Visits: 11,167

You often skim over what I say and react to what's on the surface Locus without addressing what I actually say.  Perhaps you're being cheeky and the smilies would indicate such but I don't feel like you're getting what I'm saying.  That my be my fault. 

Actually I firstly identify myself as a human being... THEN an American. But who's counting!

This is a given.  It's like, I'm a male or I have a beard or I slept last night... well that's not always a given .  Yes, working to make a better world is wonderful and I join you in this, but if you lived in a rotten country, how easy would it be to do this?  Cleanse the inner vessel first, then fix the world.  That's not to say you can't do both

I disagree. But then, I guess I have more faith in humanity than you do!

Most liberals do.  What evidence to you have that humanity is generally good?  The last 7000 years?  The last 500?  The last 100?  The last 10?  No, the evidence points to the fact that humanity is generally rotten unless we are taught or forced to be "good"... and even then it doesn't always work. 

No, of course not. I wish GWB felt the same way!

So, what liberties have you lost during Evil Booshmeister's been in office?  Still, I generally agree that the move has been towards less freedom, though this has not been exclusive to Bushy.

Well, they are not, but the latter does not require Nationalism as a motivating factor. I do not worship at the altar of Nationalism. I do not require it, it doesn't get me out of bed each day, that is what I am saying. Patriotic, yes, you betcha. But nationalistic, no, never!

Perhaps we are battling a war of semantics. 

Nationalism

1.national spirit or aspirations.
2.devotion and loyalty to one's own nation; patriotism.
3.excessive patriotism; chauvinism.
4.the desire for national advancement or independence.
5.the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one's own nation, viewed as separate from the interests of other nations or the common interests of all nations.
6.an idiom or trait peculiar to a nation.
7.a movement, as in the arts, based upon the folk idioms, history, aspirations, etc., of a nation.

Patriotism is one definition of Nationalism.  I am not saying that we should worship at the alter of nationalism.  I am only saying that a degree of nationalism is not a bad thing and in fact can be a force for good as long as the nation one is nationalistic to is a good one. 

Nothing, sir, nothing at all. But you know, good intentions pave the road to hell, you know this, right?

You respond to my parentheses?

Nuke:

I tend to agree with Biz's description of Nationalism. Patriotism to me is loving your country and being proud of its history, etc. Nationalism is preferring your nation at the expense of others. That sorta thing.

Was that Biz's description?  Biz?

8/15/2008 1:05 AM


Radical Centrist

Radical Centrist

Last Seen:
Today @ 6:04 PM


Posts: 5,592
Visits: 27,821

to put it into context:

Biz said:


Nationalism is pride in your own sovereignty and involves exclusive focus towards the betterment of your country even if it is irrespective of another country. The emphasis is still towards the betterment of one's own country and promotion of it's individual sovereignty.


Nuke said:

I tend to agree with Biz's description of Nationalism. Patriotism to me is loving your country and being proud of its history, etc. Nationalism is preferring your nation at the expense of others. That sorta thing.


You be the judge! Is "even if it is irrespective of another country" the same as "at the expense of of others." You might say there is a difference, but there is a fine line, in my opinion. They are more or less the same.

jerm, I will get back to you this weekend.
8/15/2008 2:43 AM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 7:47 PM


Posts: 4,494
Visits: 11,167

I don't think it's so clear.  "Irrespective of" and "at the expense of" are not the same thing.  I really do wonder what Biz meant, though perhaps it's a bit nit picky.  I know what Nuke means and that should be enough.  I do think there is a bit of subjectivity in the definition of "Nationalism" and "Patriotism" though Nationalism seems to do with one's feelings toward his nation while Patriotism seems to be more about the outward expression of it. 

The definition of Nationalism I am speaking of is pride in one's country.  I want people to be proud of the countries they are citizens of, especially when there are things to be proud of.  It's good to see all these countries draped in their flags.  In theory, the olympics are the perfect expression of nationalism.  The world comes together but they compete as a nation against other nations.  This definition does not mean that one has unwaivering/unquestioning support for everything their country does but it does mean they believe that there is something good about their country and that it's values are more important than any one citizen.  That doesn't mean we have some communist type of a system where everyone moves for the greater good.  It means that the values their country upholds are worth sacrificing and even dying for when needed.  Sure people work for their pocketbooks but if crisis arises will they have the national pride to work for the betterment?  I do not know if this is the case today but in WW2 nationalism certainly had a heavy hand in our efforts, even if nationalism also was the cause.  If that kind of nationalism is gone today (and certainly it has waivered among some), I do not think that it is for the better.

8/15/2008 9:08 AM


Grognard fantôme

Grognard fantôme

Last Seen:
Yesterday @ 9:35 PM


Posts: 7,585
Visits: 9,899

According to Benedict Anderson, one fairly influential cultural anthropologist, nations are "Imagined Communities".

Benedict Anderson defined a nation as "an imagined political community [that is] imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign".[1] An imagined community is different from an actual community because it is not (and cannot be) based on quotidian face-to-face interaction between its members. Instead, members hold in their minds a mental image of their affinity. As Anderson puts it, a nation "is imagined because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion".[1]

As someone who regards humans from a more evolutionary perspective, i.e., by placing human natura history into the context of the phylogenetic-bush of ape-lineages out of which we emerged 6 to 8 million years ago: I see considerable merit in this perspective on nationalism. It is also applicable to a lesser degree to other Emic conceptions of social identity such as ethnicity, and race.

8/15/2008 1:11 PM


Elite Pathogen

Elite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite PathogenElite Pathogen

Last Seen:
Today @ 7:47 PM


Posts: 4,494
Visits: 11,167

Hmm, it is, I suppose an imagined community in a sense but I think more ties a nation together than just this imaginary affinity.  At least in the west today, nations are also connected by some basic values and even culture.  So, while I may never meet someone in New York, or Oregon, there's a good chance that we share many values in common.  I share many values with you Scipio, even though I know there are many we don't.  The values that we seem to agree upon are fundamentally American values.  Freedom, democracy, rule of law, a nation for the people.  Slight subcultural influences aside, the fact that I can move almost anywhere in this large geographical area and still feel like I'm in "America" is a testament that this is not just imagined.  On the other hand, I go much less distance south and I'm in a totally different world.